Here’s proof. Do you really imagine the McCain vetting process was so very cursory that they’d to miss a faked pregnancy? You’ve really become quite delusional. The baby is clearly hers, quit talking about it. And for the love, you’re going after a 17 year-old girl and pointing out physical attributes that she may not be so proud of. Leave her alone.
Loading ...
Yeah, who would have thought that even a pillow under the shirt wouldn’t work in this position. Hell, even the reporter has larger breasts than a 7 month pregnant women. Next.
Well you do seem to be quite the expert on women’s bodies there Ed. I simply can’t understand why the feminists aren’t in love with Obama and his fans.
Of course, there really is no response that would satisfy you. You’ve already decided upon a reality regarding this Palin baby thing–one that astonishingly violates Occam’s razor, I might add–and you probably stumbled upon my blog in search of some more juicy “facts” to back up that reality. Even the revelation that Palin’s daughter is currently 5 months pregnant isn’t really enough to rock your confidence in this conspiracy theory. You did know about her daughter, of course. Why would someone who wasn’t extraordinarily well-informed post a comment with such resolution as yours?
Hope to see you back here, Ed, and I mean that in all seriousness. I think you’re presence here will be lively and fun.
So ED, how did Sarah make her face look like the face of a pregnant woman too?
Nothing more blue-nosed than a left-wing moralist, by the way.
To Andrew Sullivan and all the other leftists pushing this garbage: look in the mirror, see the creep, own up to the creep, overcome the creep.
One problem. If that’s on the close of the Alaska legislature, that would have to be on or around 13th April 2008.
This photo is from March 14th 2008.
http://www.daylife.com/photo/0fcQ5EM7gafd9
I know some women don’t show…but I’ve never seen a woman that doesn’t show for 11 months, then “WHOA look I’m pregnant!”. Interesting how sceptics in this are being called “leftists” instead of “concerned voters”. What’s next, we question where Palin was when her daughter got pregnant, and we’re called “anti-American misogynists?” And her face doesn’t look that “pregnant” to me…less in fact than the reporter she’s talking to.
And being that McCain had by all accounts, including Palin’s own, only ever met her ONCE six months ago, and neither McCains or Palin’s staff knew about the VP nomination til the morning of the announcement – WHAT vetting process couldn’t have missed a fake pregnancy?
You’re not being called concerned voters because you’re not allowing any reasonable evidence to satisfy you. Like I said, Occam’s razor is in complete violation here. I’ll save you the extra Google search: it means that you’re making your conclusion based on a greater than necessary number of assumptions rather than accepting the most reasonable explanation. You seem to be quite content to back up your arguments with details that have been reported by the smear merchants but never substantiated.
Also, are you at all aware how long the human gestation period is?
Also, here’s some info to chew on regarding that vetting process that you say occurred last minute. Not sure where you got that info, but I assure you, the Daily Kos isn’t renowned for it’s journalistic scrutiny.
nice try
According to Wikipedia “Maternal age influences the chances of conceiving a baby with Down syndrome. At maternal age 20 to 24, the probability is one in 1562; at age 35 to 39 the probability is one in 214, and above age 45 the probability is one in 19.”
Based on this alone, the probability is greatly in favor of Trig being Sarah’s baby, not Bristol’s
Well, I just found this footage last night, dated April 5, 2008. Take a look. SHE WAS NOT PREGNANT in this interview. Fastforward about 4min in.
http://alaskapodshow.blip.tv/file/802962/
Tell me what you think. She’s a liar, a flat out liar.
@pbrown: Glad to see you’re ahead of the curve, pbrown. Even in spite of her daughter currently being pregnant, you’re clinging to your conspiracy theory. You’ve got more faith than most, my friend.
Hey, I’m not so concerned about Palin’s family. We all have our family stuff. What’ I’m more concerned about are her qualifications to assist the person who theoretically will be running the country (certainly not in tune with McCain on his views, either). She was the Mayor of a small town in Alaska? I’m guessing the only qualifications she had were: 1) she’s a woman, 2) she’s good-looking and 3)THINKS she’s “folksy”. Do the right-wingers think that women are so stupid that they’ll vote for a pair that contains a woman just because they have a woman? And that country folk are so hard up for a folksy person (hmmm….remember Geo W.)? Puh-leez. I really think we have more to be concerned about than her possible embarrassment or her desire to protect her family, or whatever her motives might be here. There IS a war going on, and there are a lot of domestic problems that have nothing to do with these issues. I guess it is more comforting to worry about these smaller issues than to worry about what is happening to the country at large.
@trpronswife: Nice straw man argument there.