You’ve no doubt been hearing the argument that Obama’s Redistribution of Wealth comment to Joe the Plumber was just a slip. (Even so, a Freudian slip is still quite revealing.) But now, new startling evidence is surfacing that it wasn’t a slip. Rather, it was revealing of an ideology that has been reasoned out by Obama. After the fold, hear the 2001 interview with Obama concerning not if Redistribution of Wealth is right or wrong but how our activist might best achieve it. It’s a foregone conclusion for Obama that it must be done.
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
And how is it best achieved? Not judicially. Not even legislatively. Administratively. Get ready folks, it’s comin’. It’s time to let your blind affections go and think logically. We are already being lied to.
UDPATE: It’s now the headline on Drudge. Nearly every journalist in America reads Drudge at the top of the workday, so if the MSM runs with this obvious headline — like anyone would expect if the MSM didn’t have a vested interest in the story’s subject — it will cripple Obama’s chances at a victory. Why? Americans are overwhelmingly against the idea of RoW. If McCain wins, he really does have Joe the Plumber and the ensuing RoW fallout to thank for it. Or we can congratulate Obama for accomplishing the daunting task of changing the minds of Americans on such a fundamental issue in a week’s time.
UPDATE II: My prediction on the only retort the Obama camp and his followers can come up with: “All taxation is Redistribution of Wealth.”
Let me help you out here before you make yourself out to be a fool. First of all, you’re dumb. The first step is acceptance, non? Now, to explain: collectively paying for a public service, like roads or military protection, is not redistribution of wealth. Any cash flow from the government being a net gain for individuals is.
UPDATE III: Keeping a running tally of video views before the Obamaniacs get it yanked from YouTube. (Don’t worry though, the PUMAs warned us, and thousands of us have all been downloading copies of the video. Down the memory hole this one will not go.)
Views @ 2:18am: 68,346
Views @ 5:18am: 128,037
Views @ 6:35pm: 1,439,077
Views @ 10:51pm on 10/28: 2,057,031
UPDATE IV: To avoid a problem when the video does go offline, I’ll go ahead and host it here. Considering it’s legit news, I’m sure the author won’t mind. See the change above.
UPDATE V: Just letting Michelle Malkin and friends know that I’ve got it hosted here.
UPDATE VI: Team O responds with a little misdirection. Notice how they’re attempting to reframe the argument? “Obama went into extensive detail to explain why the courts should not get into that business of ‘redistributing’ wealth.” No he didn’t. He did not at all. And any thinking person listening to him speak knows that. He clearly lamented that the courts didn’t do enough to push the redistributionist agenda.
Obama loves Redistribution of Wealth, and merely saying that he doesn’t now in no way changes that.
Loading ...
Linked! Thanks. And thanks for downloading and saving!
@Rose: Sure thing Rose! And note that I’ve just switched the video over to being hosted on my server. And I’m the server admin. Nothing to stop us now!
Really lame question, but I’d rather look lame than have Obama win: I have loaded it form this site:
http://www12.zippyshare.com/v/93847714/file.html
(via http://hillbuzz.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/urgent-download-this-video-because-obamas-followers-will-take-it-down-soon/ see comment #10)
but when I go to open it, it says choose an application. Which app do I choose? I’m on a MAC.
Please help!
Thanks, thanks, thanks!!!!
@fireweed: Right, that’s because the file you downloaded is a Flash file. It’s trying to find the Flash application by Adobe to open the file. You’ll need to use a converter to be able to watch it in anything like iTunes. Try something like this.
Obama says the Constitution is flawed:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11OhmY1obS4
@BurL: HEY! Look who was able to post a comment!
And yes, it’s just disgusting. For a man that’s all about hope, he sure does speak negatively all the time. I can’t wait.
[...] was playing with Stumble Upon today when I found this website with audio proof that Mr. Obama has no qualms against redistributing wealth, and has (evidently) spent a great deal [...]
Thank you for hosting this file–it’s such an important message for people to hear, yet nobody wants to believe it!
BHO is a real communist: he wants to redistribute harworking persons money to welfare recipients, but he doesn’t want to give his money away, on the contrary, he is asking for more. In the communist system all are equal except that some are a few notches more equal than the other equals.
If I had a chance I would ask him WHY he wants to CHANGE USA, the best country in the world, and not change his native Africa, the worst continent in the world.
A quote that sums it up on 2008 elections:
Whoever casts a vote for Obama-Biden is nothing more than a common thief.
Whoever fails to vote against them is nothing more than a moral coward.
I can only add:
Any christian voting for BHO, or not voting against him, is casting a vote for the devil.
IMHO: voting 4 BHO are: 1. blacks (except the clever, educated ones, since all they care is welfare) 2. young (and definitely foolish) whites swayed by rap music (if they like that sh*t they are plain idiots) 3. mature & old idiots that couldn’t find shelter in an asylum for mentally ill (since all asilyms are overcrowded) 4. idiots of every color, race, or religion, especialy muslims (do I need to say why muslims? ;-b ) (this class is prevalent in the US)
See reports and pictures of early voting lines: 99% blacks! (they do not work so each of them can go and vote several times a day, thanks to ACORN voter fraud)
COMMIES SONG: ALL WE CARE IS OUR WELFARE, LET THE STUPID WORK TO EARN MORE, WE WILL MAKE MORE KIDS AND GET BETTER FARE ON REDISTRIBUTED WELFARE!
@JoseMarino: Whoa… I’m sure the popularity of this video has brought people to my blog that don’t normally engage in our discussions, so you’re probably not aware of the typical level of discourse in which we’re proud to engage here. While everyone is welcome to make their point as they see fit, I must say your comment is probably one of the most generalized, bigoted comments I’ve seen a long time. There are fantastic reasons that we shouldn’t vote for Obama, so when there is much need to fight him on the issues, it does no good to sink to that level. It’s not productive, it’s not healthy for you as a person, and it only casts a poor light on those who oppose Obama by reinforcing his supporters’ claims that people opposing Obama are racists. I appreciate your desire to contribute, but your contribution saddens me.